Ahahaa if I tel you to get f***ed I mean it in the nicest possible way.. You have a very good point. The smartest, hardest working members of society are too busy working to have large families. One or two kids. Often none. The wasters and indolent are all at home al day with nothing to do but to keep popping out one welfare recipient after another, who will in turn grow to repeat the cycle. Long term, it will mean a gradual decline in the quality of mankind and the society's ability to pay for itself.. interesting theory. Your duty is clear. Go out and procreate!!
 Ri Ben Guo.jpg)
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Ahahaa if I tel you to get f***ed I mean it in the nicest possible way.. You have a very good point. The smartest, hardest working members of society are too busy working to have large families. One or two kids. Often none. The wasters and indolent are all at home al day with nothing to do but to keep popping out one welfare recipient after another, who will in turn grow to repeat the cycle. Long term, it will mean a gradual decline in the quality of mankind and the society's ability to pay for itself.. interesting theory. Your duty is clear. Go out and procreate!!
WHO TOLD YOU YOUR DNA WAS ANY GOOD IN THE FIRST PLACE?
who the **** do you think you are
nice try hitler, go back to your bunker
Congratulations. You just won a Darwin Award.
There's no such thing as "superior DNA", and even if you have a lot of kids, there's no guarantee that "your" DNA would be passed on
..
o Your DNA isn't superior quality if you're not reproducing.
o Humans don't breed like bacteria. You don't see people undergoing binary fission every 20-40 minutes when they've been well-fed.
Based on your question, you seem like a good candidate for a low-quality human.
your dna will die off . superior way to go